Showing posts with label growth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label growth. Show all posts

This is how the World Bank destroys economies.

The moment you read an analysis like India to Become Fastest Growing Big Economy published in Wall Street Journal on Jan 14, 2015 (http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2015/01/14/world-bank-india-set-to-become-worlds-fastest-growing-big-economy/?mod=e2tw) you realise how the World Bank destroys economies.

The article is based on a World Bank analysis. It says: "The Washington-based development institution raised its forecast for India, saying growth in Asia's third largest economy would accelerate in the coming years even as much of the world is slowing down. The reason? New Delhi is implementing changes that will make the country's economy more efficient and vibrant."

This is almost similar to how the World Bank had eulogised the economic policies of the previous NDA regime that led to the coining of the popular slogan: Shining India. The political debacle the ruling party had suffered as a consequence drove them out of power for the next 10 years. That's a slogan the party does not want to be reminded of.

But then, World Bank has nothing to lose. At a time when the global economy is down in dumps, World Bank needs a saviour to justify its existence. Such is the desperation for increasing growth that countries like Britain and Italy have already started including prostitution and drug sales in its growth computations. That surely is some development that the world should be proud of !

Going the China path is being aggressively advocated for India while at a time China itself has changed its growth roadmap. Former Chinese President had acknowledged that 12 to 14 per cent GDP growth was unsustainable and China will try to operate at an average of 7 per cent or so. After all these years of phenomenal growth in manufacturing, China now faces a slump. Its manufacturing exports have come down by 2.3 per cent, and as a study shows its manufacturing is now becoming uncompetitive. The first Chinese manufacturing company has already moved offshore to Africa, and it is expected China will lose 85 million jobs to Africa in the next few years.  With agriculture destroyed deliberately, and with farm lands turning unproductive because of massive pollution and also with more fertile land forcibly acquired, the bigger question the world faces is: Who will feed China in the years to come?

China is the world's worst environmental disaster. World Bank would never talk about the dark side. The reason? The bigger the disaster, the higher is the GDP. That's not the path that India needs to follow. India should be able to carve out a sustainable pathway for itself rather than following blindly the World Bank prescription. It surely has the acumen to work out an economic model that meets the aspirations of the person at the extreme end, and at the same time not push the country's environment into a disaster mode. I am hopeful that Prime Minister Narendra Modi would see through the global design, and not bend backwards to adjust to the failed economic thinking. As Jospeh Stiglitz rightly says the world is witnessing economic madness.

Some years back, the then Chinese deputy Minister for Environment Pan Yue had in an interview to the German publication Der Spiegel (Mar 7, 2005) had said: 'The Chinese miracle will end soon'. I share this interview again with the hope there would be some sensible people who would understand the disastrous implications of the World Bank prescription. It's an interview that every policy maker must read:

The world has been dazzled in recent years by the economic strides being made by China. But it has come at a huge cost to the country's environment. Pollution is a serious and costly problem. Pan Yue of the ministry of the environment says these problems will soon overwhelm the country and will create millions of "environmental refugees.

SPIEGEL: China is dazzling the world with its booming economy, which grew by 9.5 percent. Aren't you pleased with this speed of growth?

Pan: Of course I am pleased with the success of China's economy. But at the same time I am worried. We are using too many raw materials to sustain this growth. To produce goods worth $10,000, for example, we need seven times more resources than Japan, nearly six times more than the United States and, perhaps most embarrassing, nearly three times more than India. Things can't, nor should they be allowed to go on like that.

SPIEGEL: Such a viewpoint is not exactly widespread in your country.

Pan: Many factors are coming together here: Our raw materials are scarce, we don't have enough land, and our population is constantly growing. Currently, there are 1.3 billion people living in China, that's twice as many as 50 years ago. In 2020, there will be 1.5 billion people in China. Cities are growing but desert areas are expanding at the same time; habitable and usable land has been halved over the past 50 years.

SPIEGEL: Still, each year China is strengthening its reputation as an economic Wonderland.

Pan: This miracle will end soon because the environment can no longer keep pace. Acid rain is falling on one third of the Chinese territory, half of the water in our seven largest rivers is completely useless, while one fourth of our citizens does not have access to clean drinking water. One third of the urban population is breathing polluted air, and less than 20 percent of the trash in cities is treated and processed in an environmentally sustainable manner. Finally, five of the ten most polluted cities worldwide are in China.

Read the full interview here: http://archive.dea.org.au/~deaorg/archive_site/node/64

Your money, My Growth.

For Cos, it's 
Mera Gaon, Mera Growth (My village, My growth) 
This headline from Economic Times yesterday (Aug 23, 2013) caught my attention. It made me once again don my thinking hat. The news report says: Even as city dwellers tighten their purse strings, 700 million rural Indians are ready and willing to spend. Knowing that rural market is still growing at 10-14 per cent, industry majors have either shifted or plan to launch a new marketing strategy luring the poor in the villages to spend more, and spend on non-essential goods.

This report comes at a time when the Indian Government is getting ready to provide subsidised food to 75 per cent of the rural population under the Food Security bill.

For a country which is caught in the matrix of growth, where growth is the new economic superstition that has been sold very effectively and widely, everyone believes that if growth happens, their lives would be better. After having sold this mantra, the trend is now to measure everything in terms of growth. If India Inc manages to extract whatever little remains in the pockets of rural poor, it becomes growth. If you empty your family silverware in the market, and become a pauper in turn, it adds to country's growth. Strange, isn't it?

I have seen Cafe Coffee Day and Barrista and the likes opening up new joints in the mofussil towns. Instead of offering me lassi, I am surprised when some farmers offer to take me to these joints for a cup of coffee. Not that they have enough money to splurge, but by inviting me to the new coffee joint where a cup pf coffee costs not less than Rs 150, they are trying to show they too have arrived. It is a symbol of prosperity (howsoever hollow it may be) that they want to demonstrate. Of course, while the farmers pocket gets empty, it adds to country's growth. Hindustan Lever, for instance, has launched an 'Operation Bharat' to tap the rural markets for fairness cream, toothpaste, Clinic Plus shampoo, Ponds cream etc etc. ITC's much publicised e-chaupals have now turned into a rural marketing chain for most FMCG products. The list is endless.

All these years, economists tell us that the terms of the trade for rural areas had been negative. The rural Current Account Deficit (CAD) had always been in red. Which means more money was being taken out of the villages than what was being invested. But over the last few years, I am sure economists must be thinking of a new terminology to correctly depict the virtual day light robbery that is taking place in the rural areas. Poor are poorer, and the share prices of India Inc have been on an upswing. Isn't this a massive transfer of money from the rural to a few in the urban areas? How can it be called growth if it makes more people relatively more poor? Time to think.

I am waiting for the day when the Economic Times headline is rewritten as: Mera Gaon, Gaon ki Growth (My village, it's growth). Till then, growth is another name for exploitation.